lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH -tip] Re: [PATCH -tip 0/2] Temporary RCU fixes for notrace and hotplug CPU
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:02:33PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:25:49PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > btw., i'm still seeing crashes with the latest RCU bits:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 20.621740] Testing event sys_enter_futex: OK
> > > > > [ 20.629738] Testing event sys_exit_futex: OK
> > > > > [ 20.637737] Testing event lock_acquire: [reboot]
> > > > >
> > > > > Possibly due to infinite recursion as well. Config attached.
> > > >
> > > > Color me confused...
> > > >
> > > > Unless someone has a better idea, I will send in a patch that adds
> > > > "notrace" to every RCU API member used by any file in the kernel
> > > > that has "trace" in its name (excluding ptrace.c and rcutree_trace.c,
> > > > of course). This list is as follows:
> > > >
> > > > call_rcu()
> > > > call_rcu_sched()
> > > > rcu_read_lock()
> > > > rcu_read_unlock()
> > > >
> > > > So, any better ideas?
> > >
> > > Tracers using RCU should use the _notrace() version of read_lock/unlock.
> > > I think the callers should be fixed rather than RCU.
> > >
> > > Tracepoints have been designed to use the _notrace variant on the
> > > instrumentation site. The core of tracepoint management use
> > > call_rcu_sched(), which can be traced without any problem.
> > >
> > > I have not followed the late tracing development as closely though, so
> > > errors might have crept in.
> >
> > Or I might have inadvertently broken something in a non-obvious (to me,
> > anyway) manner.
> >
> > So, would you be willing to look at commit bc33f24bd in the -tip
> > tree and see if there is anything I broke other than the now-fixed
> > rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() and rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace()?
> > And for that matter, whether my alleged fix for these two API members
> > really does fix the problem (-tip commit 7c614d6461)?
> >
> > The -tip tree is at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
> >
> > And these patches are on the tip/core/rcu branch.
> >
>
> sure, here we go:
>
> static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
> {
> preempt_disable_notrace();
> + __acquire(RCU_SCHED);
> + rcu_read_acquire();
> }
>
> and
>
>
> static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
> {
> + rcu_read_release();
> + __release(RCU_SCHED);
> preempt_enable_notrace();
> }
>
> will make those _notrace primitives call into lockdep. I don't think
> this is correct, and this might be causing your problem.
>
> rcu_read_acquire/release are calling lock_acquire/release, those should
> be removed.
>
> __acquire() simply seems to be defined to a gcc "context" attribute,
> probably for the sparse checker. I think it should be safe to leave them
> there.

Thank you for looking this over, Mathieu!!! Please see below for patch.

Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remove lockdep annotations from RCU's _notrace() API members.

The lockdep annotations rcu_read_acquire() and rcu_read_release()
might lead to infinite looping if called from lockdep. So this patch
removes them.

Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

rcupdate.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 8b4422c..95e0615 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
{
preempt_disable_notrace();
__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
- rcu_read_acquire();
}

/*
@@ -211,7 +210,6 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
}
static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
{
- rcu_read_release();
__release(RCU_SCHED);
preempt_enable_notrace();
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-25 20:39    [W:0.077 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site