Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:12:50 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:03 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > I asked the questions I did out of pure curiosity, and that curiosity > > has been satisfied. It's not that I find it useless or whatnot (or that > > my opinion matters to anyone but me;). I personally find the concept of > > injecting an RTOS into a general purpose OS with no isolation to be > > alien. Intriguing, but very very alien. > > Well lets work on the isolation piece then. We could run a regular process > on the RT cpu and switch back when OS services are needed?
If there were isolation, that would make it much less alien to _me_. Isolation would kinda destroy the reason it was written though. RT application/OS is injected into the network stack, which is kinda cool, but makes the hairs on my neck stand up.
-Mike
| |