lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutilsandconsolidate linker script

* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 16:14 >>>
> >
> >* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 15:56 >>>
> >> >Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and
> >> >'clean up' portions?
> >>
> >> Besides being cumbersome, that would make it even larger, so I'd
> >> say that's not worth it.
> >
> >I mean the two patches yield the same end result. The first one
>
> I also understood it that way.
>
> >(which is smaller, hopefully) gets committed to x86/urgent, the
> >second one (the cleanups and other non-essentials) gets pushed
> >upstream in .32.
>
> The cleanup part really isn't much more than what I described with
> "Once touching this code, also use the various data section helper
> macros from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.", and if the first
> patch wouldn't use those macros, it would just grow and become
> even less readable.

fair enough. Lets hope it all goes fine.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-25 16:51    [W:0.170 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site