Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:46:07 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: make munlock fast when mlock is canceled by sigkill | From | Minchan Kim <> |
| |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:03:30 +0100 (BST) > Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: >> My advice (but I sure hate giving advice before I've tried it myself) >> is to put __mlock_vma_pages_range() back to handling just the mlock >> case, and do your own follow_page() loop in munlock_vma_pages_range(). >> > > I have no objections to make use of follow_page().
Me, too. We don't need to add new flag although there is simple method like this.
> Thanks, > -Kame > >
-- Kind regards, Minchan Kim
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |