Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:07:31 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume (updated) |
| |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> There's a problem that for safety reasons I maintain the ordering of dpm_list > and the callbacks are scheduled for async execution in the same order in > which they would have been executed synchronously. If were to change this, > we'd have to be _very_ careful.
Why? The order in which jobs are scheduled for async execution doesn't bear any particular relation to the order in which they get run.
Alan Stern
| |