lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects
On 08/17/2009 06:09 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specific
>> differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear
>> (and steal) them though.
>>
>>
> You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh?
>
>

If I've offended you, I apologize.

> Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it
> apparently falls on deaf ears.
>

Well, I'm sorry, I truly don't think I've had that question answered
with specificity. I'm really interested in it (out of a selfish desire
to improve virtio), but the only comment I recall from you was to the
effect that the virtio rings were better than ioq in terms of cache
placement.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-17 17:21    [W:0.129 / U:1.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site