lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
Date
> 1. implementers of the clock API which have not been subject
> to my rigorous review abuse it to the point of making the API
> essentially useless, and that causes Mark problems.

If that's a problem, when something needs changes. An API that
can only be managed by implementers due to rigorous review lacks
something, maybe easy-of-use, maybe documentation. Can it be the
case that the current state makes you a single-point of failure?

If yes, I'd at least suggest better docs in linux/Documentation,
e.g. describe the big-picture, the implementation and common
cave-ats, e.g. why an approach "uniquely name every single
clock ... makes the API pointless" doesn't work.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-02 10:01    [W:0.219 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site