Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Dec 2009 22:27:58 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33 |
| |
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> However, the parent can be on a different bus type than the children, so it > looks like we can only start the asynchronous path at the core level.
Agreed.
> > Unless you want to do _all_ of the async logic in generic code and > > re-introduce the "dev->async_suspend" flag. > > Quite frankly, I would like to. > > > I would be ok with that now that the infrastructure seems so simple. > > Well, perhaps I should dig out my original async suspend/resume patches > that didn't contain all of the non-essential stuff and post them here for > discussion, after all ...
That seems like a very good idea. IIRC they were quite similar to what we have been discussing.
Alan Stern
| |