lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/14] Convert remaining arches to read/update_persistent_clock
From
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:08:10 +0900

> In any event, I wonder if it might make more sense to take something like
> the SPARC implementation that is simply a wrapper around the RTC, move
> that out in to a more generic place, and permit architectures to select
> an RTC class backed persistent clock instead (it seems to be only
> platforms that haven't caught up yet in terms of generic time and RTC
> migration that would want to define this interface on their own at all at
> this point)?

This sounds nice but don't we have a slew of RTC types that need
to be accessed over I2C and thus you can't touch them without
sleeping?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-24 05:57    [W:0.609 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site