Messages in this thread | | | From | Jason Garrett-Glaser <> | Date | Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:39:20 -0500 | Subject | Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS |
| |
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari@gmail.com> wrote: > Benchmarks for the new threading model are up, along with a few others: > > http://doom10.org/index.php?topic=78.0 > > Interestingly enough, CFS beats BFS on zerolatency by a significant > margin. Unsurprisingly, given the threading model, the optimal number > of threads is equal to the number of cores. > > Jason >
And I am apparently blind: I cannot read graphs. Ignore the conclusion made in the above post ;)
Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |