Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:27:56 +0100 | From | Stefan Bader <> | Subject | Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: unify iwl_setup_rxon_timing |
| |
Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:39:24AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:34:00AM -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >> >>> I agree here. Not copying Reinette on this is just wrong. And blindly >>> picking some patches and sending them for -stable even more. >> I agree that Reinette should have been copied. I'm not sure I agree >> that sending the patches was wrong by itself. > > I'm not saying it is wrong, but I agree, you need to copy the > maintainer, as we would need their ack before being able to accept any > type of backport. > > Ike, the script, scripts/get_maintainer.pl is your friend here.
I should take some of the bashing here for not having been too specific when pushing people to "send it to stable". As John said, we are learning here.
I see that this gets improved.
Thanks, Stefan
> thanks, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |