Messages in this thread Patch in this message | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:08:52 -0500 | From | Neil Horman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix tracing infrastructure to support multiple includes when defining CREATE_TRACE_POINTS |
| |
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:50:58PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:53:41PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:49:26PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note this patch also converts the napi_poll tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT. This > > > > > is done so that the TRACE_EVENT fix doesn't break the build, and because its > > > > > rather pointless I think given the current tracing infrastructure to not have > > > > > napi_poll be an independent event. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> > > > > > > > > Thanks, I'll give it a test. But because this now touches networking > > > > code, I need an Acked-by from David Miller before I can pull it in. > > > > > > > > -- Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > linux/tracepoint.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > > > > > trace/define_trace.h | 1 + > > > > > trace/events/napi.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > > > > Hmm, This really isn't networking code. But still, a patch that changes > > > the way a networking trace point works, I would rather have an ack. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Copy that, I agree an Ack from dave is called for here, but Just FYi, theres > > only one user of this tracepoint currently in the tree (the drop monitor) and > > this change has no bearing on it, as you can still hook the tracepoint with the > > same register_trace_napi_poll call > > > > Neil > > > Ping, Dave, any thoughts here? > Regards > Neil
So because I have no patience, I asked Dave M. about this on irc last night, and he asked that I append his ACK to it, so here's the patch again, with his blessing by proxy :)
Fix tracing infrastructure to allow multiple header files with TRACE_EVENTS to be included with CREATE_TRACE_EVENTS defined
I've been workingon adding a few tracepoints to the network stack, and in so doing it was convienient for me to add a second include file to net/core/net-traces.c with TRACE_EVENTS defined in them. net-traces.c defines CREATE_TRACE_EVENTS, and during the build it was failing, complaining about duplicate definitions of __tpstrtab_<name>. I tracked down the bug to find that define_trace.h redefined DECLARE_TRACE to be DEFINE_TRACE, so after the first run through define_trace.h (which is included from skb.h, included in net-trace.c first), the DECLARE_TRACE macro was left with an improper definition to start a new cycle with the next header.
The fix I came up with was to make sure that DECLARE_TRACE was undefined at the end of define_trace.h, and to add a conditional re-definition in tracepoint.h. This places us back in the proper state to define a new set of tracepoints in a subsequent header file.
Note this patch also converts the napi_poll tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT. This is done so that the TRACE_EVENT fix doesn't break the build, and because its rather pointless I think given the current tracing infrastructure to not have napi_poll be an independent event.
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
linux/tracepoint.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- trace/define_trace.h | 1 + trace/events/napi.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h index 2aac8a8..311abbf 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h @@ -58,28 +58,6 @@ struct tracepoint { rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \ } while (0) -/* - * Make sure the alignment of the structure in the __tracepoints section will - * not add unwanted padding between the beginning of the section and the - * structure. Force alignment to the same alignment as the section start. - */ -#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \ - extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name; \ - static inline void trace_##name(proto) \ - { \ - if (unlikely(__tracepoint_##name.state)) \ - __DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name, \ - TP_PROTO(proto), TP_ARGS(args)); \ - } \ - static inline int register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \ - { \ - return tracepoint_probe_register(#name, (void *)probe); \ - } \ - static inline int unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \ - { \ - return tracepoint_probe_unregister(#name, (void *)probe);\ - } - #define DEFINE_TRACE_FN(name, reg, unreg) \ static const char __tpstrtab_##name[] \ @@ -173,6 +151,29 @@ static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void) * trace event headers under one "CREATE_TRACE_POINTS" the first include * will override the TRACE_EVENT and break the second include. */ +#if defined(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) && !defined(DECLARE_TRACE) +/* + * Make sure the alignment of the structure in the __tracepoints section will + * not add unwanted padding between the beginning of the section and the + * structure. Force alignment to the same alignment as the section start. + */ +#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \ + extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name; \ + static inline void trace_##name(proto) \ + { \ + if (unlikely(__tracepoint_##name.state)) \ + __DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name, \ + TP_PROTO(proto), TP_ARGS(args)); \ + } \ + static inline int register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \ + { \ + return tracepoint_probe_register(#name, (void *)probe); \ + } \ + static inline int unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \ + { \ + return tracepoint_probe_unregister(#name, (void *)probe);\ + } +#endif #ifndef TRACE_EVENT /* diff --git a/include/trace/define_trace.h b/include/trace/define_trace.h index 2a4b3bf..a3e0095 100644 --- a/include/trace/define_trace.h +++ b/include/trace/define_trace.h @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ #undef TRACE_EVENT #undef TRACE_EVENT_FN #undef TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ +#undef DECLARE_TRACE /* Only undef what we defined in this file */ #ifdef UNDEF_TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE diff --git a/include/trace/events/napi.h b/include/trace/events/napi.h index a8989c4..25a1709 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/napi.h +++ b/include/trace/events/napi.h @@ -1,11 +1,30 @@ -#ifndef _TRACE_NAPI_H_ +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM +#define TRACE_SYSTEM napi + +#if !defined(_TRACE_NAPI_H_) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) #define _TRACE_NAPI_H_ #include <linux/netdevice.h> #include <linux/tracepoint.h> -DECLARE_TRACE(napi_poll, +TRACE_EVENT(napi_poll, + TP_PROTO(struct napi_struct *napi), - TP_ARGS(napi)); + + TP_ARGS(napi), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field( struct napi_struct *, napi) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->napi = napi; + ), + + TP_printk("napi poll on napi struct %p for device %s", + __entry->napi, __entry->napi->dev->name) +); #endif + +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |