lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix a typo in drivers/acpi/battery.c
On 12/13/09 17:21, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:23:18 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/09 15:15, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:48:56 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>>>> index 3f4602b..cada73f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>>>> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
>>>> dev_name(&device->dev), event,
>>>> acpi_battery_present(battery));
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
>>>> - /* acpi_batter_update could remove power_supply object */
>>>> + /* acpi_battery_update could remove power_supply object */
>>>> if (battery->bat.dev)
>>>> kobject_uevent(&battery->bat.dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
>>>> #endif
>>>> --
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You don't need an intro patch email and then the patch email
>>> for such a simple patch.
>>>
>>> Also, please note (from "MAINTAINERS" or from scripts/get_maintainer.pl)
>>> that acpi patches go to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org .
>>>
>>> ---
>>> ~Randy
>>>
>>
>> So should I resend this to acpi then, or just
>> take note of this the next time?
>
> I'd say resend to linux-acpi and cc: the acpi maintainer.
>
> ---
> ~Randy
>

there you have it.
cc'd len brown
(not sure who the acpi maintainers are)

Justin P. Mattock


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-14 03:37    [W:0.209 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site