Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:35:32 -0800 | From | "Justin P. Mattock" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix a typo in drivers/acpi/battery.c |
| |
On 12/13/09 17:21, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:23:18 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> On 12/13/09 15:15, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:48:56 -0800 Justin P. Mattock wrote: >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c >>>> index 3f4602b..cada73f 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c >>>> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) >>>> dev_name(&device->dev), event, >>>> acpi_battery_present(battery)); >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER >>>> - /* acpi_batter_update could remove power_supply object */ >>>> + /* acpi_battery_update could remove power_supply object */ >>>> if (battery->bat.dev) >>>> kobject_uevent(&battery->bat.dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); >>>> #endif >>>> -- >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> You don't need an intro patch email and then the patch email >>> for such a simple patch. >>> >>> Also, please note (from "MAINTAINERS" or from scripts/get_maintainer.pl) >>> that acpi patches go to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org . >>> >>> --- >>> ~Randy >>> >> >> So should I resend this to acpi then, or just >> take note of this the next time? > > I'd say resend to linux-acpi and cc: the acpi maintainer. > > --- > ~Randy >
there you have it. cc'd len brown (not sure who the acpi maintainers are)
Justin P. Mattock
| |