lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Fix MATCH_END_ONLY filter matching
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:10:31AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 13:27 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:20:04PM +0100, Frederic Riss wrote:
> > > 2009/12/11 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>:
> > > > For '*foo' pattern, we should allow any string ending with
> > > > 'foo', but ftrace filter incorrectly disallows strings
> > > > like bar_foo_foo:
> > > [...]
> > > > case MATCH_END_ONLY:
> > > > - ptr = strstr(str, regex);
> > > > - if (ptr && (ptr[len] == 0))
> > > > + slen = strlen(str);
> > > > + if (slen >= len && memcpy(str + slen - len, regex, len))
> > > > matched = 1;
> > >
> > > Shouldn't that be memcmp() == 0? I don't see how memcpy might serve as
> > > a compare operator.
> > >
> > > Fred.
> >
> >
> > Oh you're right, I reviewed it too quickly. Perhaps the star's
> > alignment made it possible for only one Frederic to review it
> > the right way...
> >
>
> The stars are still fuzzy to me. How does memcpy work here?


It doesn't, I guess Li intended to use memcmp.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-11 18:49    [W:0.059 / U:1.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site