Re: [patch 9/9] security: Fix invalid rcu assumptions in comments
Date
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:01:22 +0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 1) held spinlocks are not equivalent to rcu_read_lock > > 2) access to current_cred() is safe as only current can modify its > own credentials. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>