lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup
Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:53:14 +0800
> "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:05:15 -0800
>>> Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:58:46 +0800 "Han, Weidong"
>>>>
>>>> I updated to Linus' latest git (as your description made me wonder
>>>> if the async stuff might play a role here). I still get an oops -
>>>> but at a different spot and the system no longer hangs - it partly
>>>> recovers (but things aren't too well - for example my USB
>>>> keyboard / mouse don't work anymore).
>>> Spoke too soon. Rebooted and had the same hard lockup again. This
>>> time I had my camera within reach, so here's the trace:
>>>
>>> device_to_iommu+0x33/0x73
>>> domain_context_mapping_one+0x37/0x335
>>> domain_context_mapping+0x25/0xa7
>>> iommu_prepare_identity+0xd7/0xf3
>>> intel_iommu_init+0x4e4/0x8f3
>>> ? mutex_lock
>>> ? sysctl_net_init
>>> ? pci_iommu_init
>>> pci_iommu_init
>>>
>>> I also have stack, code and register values. Let me know if you need
>>> them. Or I can just post the picture :-)
>>>
>>> Again, very latest git tree, VT-d enabled.
>>>
>>> /D
>> I tried latest git tree, it works for me. Above call trace looks
>> right.
>
> Spent some more time reading the code. Can't quite claim to understand
> all of it, yet, but I notice that most everywhere else drhd->devices[i]
> is checked to be != NULL before it is accessed. Why is it safe not to
> do that in device_to_iommu()?
>
> Would the patch below be a valid fix? It stops my system from hanging at
> boot. But I wonder if there is an assertion that if drhd->ignored is 0
> then drhd->devices[0..drhd->device_cnt] is known to be != NULL and
> therefore this test is just hiding a bug somewhere else...
>
> /D
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> index 235fb7a..3dfecb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -438,7 +438,8 @@ static struct intel_iommu *device_to_iommu(u8 bus,
> u8 devfn) continue;
>
> for (i = 0; i < drhd->devices_cnt; i++)
> - if (drhd->devices[i]->bus->number == bus &&
> + if (drhd->devices[i] &&
> + drhd->devices[i]->bus->number == bus &&
> drhd->devices[i]->devfn == devfn)
> return drhd->iommu;
>

Did you see following in the kernel message?
printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
"Device scope device [%04x:%02x:%02x.%02x] not found\n",
segment, scope->bus, path->dev, path->fn);

If yes, then
Acked-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-09 17:19    [W:0.378 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site