lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kbuild vs ccache
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:03:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> make clean; ccache -s > before-`git describe`; make -j9; ccache -s > after-`git describe`; diff -u {before,after}-`git describe`
>
> v2.6.28:
>
> -cache hit 737661
> -cache miss 979624
> -called for link 78268
> +cache hit 738093 = +432
> +cache miss 980524 = +900
> +called for link 78289 = +21
> multiple source files 373
> compile failed 5679
> preprocessor error 1594
> -not a C/C++ file 44512
> +not a C/C++ file 44549 = +37
>
> 1332 cacheable
> 58 uncacheable
>
>
> v2.6.28-7485-g9e42d0c:
>
> -cache hit 738096 = +9
> +cache hit 738105
> cache miss 980524 = +0
> -called for link 78293
> +called for link 79659 = +1366
> multiple source files 373
> compile failed 5679
> preprocessor error 1594
> -not a C/C++ file 44549 = +1384
> +not a C/C++ file 45933
>
> 9 cacheable
> 2750 uncacheable
>
>
> What changed?

Before we did a straight .c -> .o
Now we do .c -> .s -> .o to mark __crc_ symbols static so we can
kill them when stripping modules.

It is already being discussed in another thread.
See "[REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc"

Sam


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-08 06:43    [W:0.711 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site