lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: OMAP clock fast-forward: an introduction to six series
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:05:13AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hello Russell,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:22:22PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > > Per rmk's preferences, some patches have been 'compressed.' That is, some
> > > fix patches have been rolled into a single patch with the original. To
> > > ease cross-referencing with the linux-omap git tree, original commit IDs
> > > have been inserted into the patch messages. Also, what would have been an
> > > extremely long series has been split into six smaller, cumulative, roughly
> > > thematic patch series. If requested, I would be pleased to simply send
> > > one large series of the original, uncompressed patches. Thanks to the git
> > > and stgit authors and contributors: without those tools, this process
> > > would have been nearly impossible.
> >
> > Since this patch series was only really meant for me to do some follow-on
> > work on it (to merge it into my tree) is it really necessary to submit
> > this 70 patch series via slow email via several mailing lists?
>
> I posted the patches for final review and upstream merging.
>
> Not sure what the follow-on work is that you mention. But if it's
> additional development work, such as modifying the linux-omap clock code
> to use your recent clkdev code, that should really be discussed
> separately, and patches posted for comment to linux-omap, so the OMAP
> community has a chance to test it first. People on that list seem to be
> pretty reasonable...

If that's what you thought I was offering, forget it. I wasn't.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-29 09:13    [W:0.285 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site