Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:58:36 +0900 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] module: kzalloc mod->ref |
| |
Rusty Russell wrote: > On Monday 26 January 2009 17:51:21 Rusty Russell wrote: >> On Thursday 15 January 2009 15:21:46 Rusty Russell wrote: >>> In fact, I've decided to go back and add Eric's patch. Since >>> alloc_percpu isn't going to be fixed this merge window, we'll do this >>> now, then simply use alloc_percpu once that is merged. >> And with the following fixes, it's in linux-next for tomorrow. > > Ingo, can I push this via your tree? I don't expect any problems, but I > hate breaking modules and it'd be nice to have indep testing and get this in > soon; linux-next is off this week. > > (The percpu alloc patchset I promised Tejun also depends trivially on this > so getting it upstream will forward that handoff).
FWIW, the patch looks good to me and I'll be happy to forward it through core/percpu.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |