Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:52:37 +0200 | From | Török Edwin <> | Subject | Re: inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input |
| |
On 2009-01-23 20:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Having said that, llvm-gcc is not yet able to compile the full Linux >> kernel on its own [for example the boot code, due to asm(".code16gcc")], >> but with LLVM 2.4 it was possible to build "arch=UM", and "arch=X86" (by >> using gcc to build the bootcode). I'd like LLVM 2.5 to be able to build >> the kernel, so I'll file bugs for llvm/kernel depending on where the >> problem is. >> > > Could we get LLVM folks on the Cc: and see how difficult it would be to > fix this on the LLVM side? Asm constraints are used all around the place > and different input/output types are very common.
I've added LLVMDev to Cc. Your first post to the list may take a little longer to reach it (first post is moderated by listmaster, no subscription required).
[For those who missed the initial conversation, see: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3373#c9]
Best regards, --Edwin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |