Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:02:27 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] NOOP cgroup subsystem |
| |
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:45:02 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:20:45 -0800 > Matthew Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I think > - Paul's suggestion sounds attractive. But I can't see fundamental differences > from user's side between "implemented as subsys" and "implemetned as cgroup's > feature". I feel it's easier for user's cgroup library to handle subsys rather > than "we can mount it anywhere, multiple times!". > Flexiblity doesn't means it's easy to use. I should consider more....
mutiple mount point means that the process can belongs to multiple nickname groups. oh yes, seems worth to try.
Thanks, -Kame
| |