Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:48:33 -0500 (EST) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: add stack trace to function tracer |
| |
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Produces the following in /debug/tracing/trace: > > kjournald-702 [001] 135.673060: io_schedule <-sync_buffer > kjournald-702 [002] 135.673671: > <= sync_buffer > <= __wait_on_bit > <= out_of_line_wait_on_bit > <= __wait_on_buffer > <= sync_dirty_buffer > <= journal_commit_transaction > <= kjournald
Note, the above is from two different CPUS. This is because I did not want to messy up the current function trace with more branches. I took the easy way out. I simply registered another tracer to the function tracer to dump out the trace.
I have an idea how to fix it. I'll work on a solution now.
-- Steve
| |