Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:40:59 +0300 | From | Badalian Vyacheslav <> | Subject | Re: deadlocks if use htb |
| |
Jarek Poplawski пишет: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:01:14AM +0200, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote: > ... > >> Jarek, can you give me exact name of patch or link to it? >> I will test it on production. >> And i am interested in searching, what is a problem. >> > > If there is nothing better I could recommend the patch below for > -stable (2.6.28), when it's tested. > > Thanks, > Jarek P. > --- > > diff -Nurp a2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c b2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c > --- a2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2008-12-11 08:16:16.000000000 +0000 > +++ b2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2008-12-15 10:44:32.000000000 +0000 > @@ -924,6 +924,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *htb_dequeue(struc > } > } > sch->qstats.overlimits++; > + qdisc_watchdog_cancel(&q->watchdog); > qdisc_watchdog_schedule(&q->watchdog, next_event); > fin: > return skb; > >
Jarek, i easy can test patch 4 without 2+3 if it needed at heavy production server. I use dynamic routing and if server crashed - traffic go to another pc after few seconds. I not test it because you say that its not needed if for me help 3+2. I apply it today and test at few servers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |