Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:34:27 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer |
| |
* Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
> >> that's even worse i think :-/ And this isnt bikeshed-painting really, > >> the RNGBF_ name hurts my eyes and RB_ is definitely confusing to read. > >> (as the rbtree constants are in capitals as well and similarly named) > >> > >> RING_TYPE_PADDING > >> > >> or: > >> > >> RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING > >> > >> yes, it's longer, but still, saner. > > > > I don't mind the extra typing, it is just a bit more difficult to keep in > > the 80 character line limit. > > Would using tb_ (trace buffer) rather than rb_ help ?
excellent idea ...
Ingo
| |