lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 -tip 0/4] x86: signal handler improvement
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> This is a gcc failure, and should be reported to the gcc people.
>> Does this gcc failure mean unnecessary storing into stack?
>>
>
> Yes, it should be able to process this in a register, instead of storing
> to the stack and then merging later.
>
> It's possible it's trying to do that to hide latency, but that's clearly
> a lose in this case.

OK, I'll test with some gcc versions.
It's necessary to check outputs of the latest gcc, I think.

thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-25 21:41    [W:0.061 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site