lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:05:55 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven
> (arjan@infradead.org) wrote:
> > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The
> > > more we have, the louder will be customers scream.
> >
> > artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just
> > shows you're more interested in making a stink than in getting
> > something improved ;(
>
> As practice shows, I'm the only one who is interested in getting
> something improved, and Intel, as we see right now, is not interested
> in it at all, since you ask me not only decrease error verbosity, but
> also do not work towards fixing the bug by trying to understand where
> it lives.

I did no such thing and you know it.

I'm sorry, I'm not going to waste time on this if you keep acting
this dishonest; welcome to my mail filter...


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-21 23:17    [W:0.116 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site