Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:06:52 +0200 | From | Pierre Ossman <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] MMC: Use write timeout value as read from CSR |
| |
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:24:22 +0100 "Matt Fleming" <mattjfleming@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > OK, I can see your point here. However, this is a completely different > change to my original patch. Would it not make more sense to queue my > original patch and then for me to write some patches to move all the > timeout info into the request structure? >
It's better to get it right directly. I'd consider this a bug fix patch, so it can be applied at any time during the development cycle.
> > So, what I propose is this. Could you please queue my bug fix (I can > send the two patches again) and then I will begin working on the > generic patches to fix the issues that you've raised in this thread? > How does that sound?
It shouldn't take that long to write the more proper solution, so get to it and it should be possible to get in even for .27.
-- -- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption.
| |