lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Subject: [PATCH] linux-acpi: smp_alternatives sleeping in spinlock
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Raz <raziebe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Raz Ben Yehuda <raziebe@gmail.com>
>>
>> When booting a kernel with PREEMPT_ENABLE and SLAB_DEBUG, unplugging a
>> processor results in BUG in slab.
>
> could you please post that BUG? (and which version of the kernel you
> have tried, and exactly what you did to trigger this bug)

Latest working kernel version: unknown
Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.26.5 <-- this is the kernel I tested.
Distribution:centos 5.0 64bit
Hardware Environment: Lenovo T61 Dual core.
Software Environment:
Problem Description:
1. configure kernel as describe in Documentation/submitCheckList section 12.
2. boot this kernel
3. run . echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpu1/online

result:

SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:3052
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Pid: 2463, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.26.5 #28

Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80251c61>] ? __debug_show_held_locks+0x1b/0x24
[<ffffffff8022aae6>] __might_sleep+0x108/0x10a
[<ffffffff802962fd>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x39/0x1a3
[<ffffffff80289432>] ? __get_vm_area_node+0xa4/0x1d7
[<ffffffff80289432>] __get_vm_area_node+0xa4/0x1d7
[<ffffffff8020a3d7>] ? disable_TSC+0x17/0x53
[<ffffffff802895c5>] get_vm_area_caller+0x2f/0x31
[<ffffffff804b2653>] ? text_poke+0x11d/0x19a
[<ffffffff80289d40>] vmap+0x31/0x63
[<ffffffff804b7b62>] ? _etext+0x0/0xe
[<ffffffff804b2653>] text_poke+0x11d/0x19a
[<ffffffff804b7b62>] ? _etext+0x0/0xe
[<ffffffff802118d4>] alternatives_smp_unlock+0x4f/0x63
[<ffffffff80211b77>] alternatives_smp_switch+0x161/0x19e
[<ffffffff8021b80c>] __cpu_die+0x5c/0x86
[<ffffffff8049d047>] _cpu_down+0x1b5/0x28d
[<ffffffff8049d145>] cpu_down+0x26/0x36
[<ffffffff8049e306>] store_online+0x32/0x75
[<ffffffff8037402e>] sysdev_store+0x24/0x26
[<ffffffff802e3134>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x121
[<ffffffff8029dddc>] vfs_write+0xae/0x124
[<ffffffff8029e320>] sys_write+0x47/0x70
[<ffffffff8020bffb>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80

Steps to reproduce:

> note that the conversion to a sleeping lock:
>
>> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smp_alt);
>> +static __DECLARE_SEMAPHORE_GENERIC(smp_alt_lock, 1);
>
> is already done correctly in the latest upstream kernel, see this
> commit:
>
> # 2f1dafe: x86: fix SMP alternatives: use mutex instead of spinlock
>
> the better solution is to use a mutex, not a semaphore. This fix is part
> of the v2.6.26 kernel.
>
> Ingo
>
yes. I understand.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-14 15:39    [W:0.089 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site