Messages in this thread | | | From | Wolfgang Walter <> | Subject | Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes | Date | Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:14:35 +0200 |
| |
On Saturday 09 August 2008, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:11:21PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote: > > > > With out the recent dynamic fpu allocation changes, while we don't see oops, > > there is a possible race still present in older kernels(for example, > > while kernel is using kernel_fpu_begin() in some optimized clear/copy > > page and an interrupt/softirq happens which uses these padlock > > instructions generating DNA fault). > > No this wasn't a problem because kernel_fpu_begin clears TS and > therefore we don't get faults on SSE instructions. > > However, with your patch it will become a problem due to the > fact that it wasn't designed to be nested. >
You mean the dynamic fpu allocation patch or the proposed patch for padlock code?
Thanks, -- Wolfgang Walter Studentenwerk München Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts Leiter EDV Leopoldstraße 15 80802 München Tel: +49 89 38196-276 Fax: +49 89 38196-144 wolfgang.walter@stwm.de http://www.studentenwerk-muenchen.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |