Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:16:39 -0400 (EDT) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [patch 01/25] ftrace: remove unneeded documentation |
| |
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:42:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > 2.6.26-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > Well, I object to this patch, but I'm sure I'll be ignored. > > Why? There is no ftrace code in the 2.6.26 kernel, so why would we > worry about keeping such documentation up to date, let alone even > present at all? > > Why should this matter?
Greg,
Don't get me wrong. I agree with the reason to pull it. It is the right thing to do. But still, I don't like it, not because I disagree with it, but simply, I liked the fact that the document made it in before the code.
I just sold my 1994 Nissan Sentra because I seldom drove it. It was the right thing to do. But I still don't like the fact that I don't have it anymore.
I don't like it. This is a feeling. Nothing to do with being technical. Hence, I will not argue it. I just want it on record that I do not _like_ it. ;-)
My objection was only symbolic.
-- Steve
| |