lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well
    Rene Herman wrote:
    > On 03-08-08 23:25, Pekka Enberg wrote:
    >
    >> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
    >
    >>> Do we have to once again explain that slab still outperforms slub on at
    >>> least one important benchmark? I hope Nick Piggin finds time to finish
    >>> tuning slqb; it already outperforms slub.
    >>
    >> No, you don't have to. I haven't merged that patch nor do I intend to
    >> do so until the regressions are fixed.
    >>
    >> And yes, I'm still waiting to hear from you how we're now doing with
    >> higher order page allocations...
    >
    > General interested question -- I recently "accidentally" read some of
    > slub and I believe that it doesn't feature the cache colouring support
    > that slab did? Is that true, and if so, wasn't it needed/useful?

    I don't know why Christoph decided not to implement it. Christoph?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-04 23:29    [W:4.169 / U:0.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site