Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:37:37 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [malware-list] request for comment: generic kernel interface for malware vendors |
| |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:13:36PM +0100, tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com wrote: > malware-list-bounces@dmesg.printk.net wrote on 29/07/2008 05:50:58: > > > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 20:39 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:18:07AM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > > > > > > > This is a request for comment. This is a first stab and I'm here to > > > > address all of the concerns that people have. Please don't hold > back, > > > > I've got thick skin. BUT, I don't want to hear 'this is how we have > > > > been doing it, do it that way.' I want to hear how this won't work > for > > > > your needs (and WHY) or how we can do it better. > > > > > > > > you can find the patches at: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/~eparis/talpa > > > > Ouch. Adds a bunch of hooks outside of LSM - what's the plan here wrt. > > LSM, because LKML folks are going to ask :) > > What is the plan with LSM is also a question? Is it gonna stay or be > removed?
LSM is staying, no need to remove it.
> Stacking looks like it will never happen and so it really doesn't cut > it for this kind of use.
Agreed, stacking is probably never going to happen.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |