lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: 2.6.27-rc4: lots of 'in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0' with software-raid1
On Thursday August 28, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>
> I'm curious about how this happened.
>
> afaict from reading the code, this:
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> might_sleep();
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> will warn if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n but won't warn if
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y. If correct, that's a nasty trap.
>
> Is that what you did?

Uhm..
$ grep PREEMPT /home/src/md-x86-64/.config
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
$ grep DEBUG_SPIN /home/src/md-x86-64/.config
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y
$ grep RCU /home/src/md-x86-64/.config
CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
# CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set

This definitely doesn't report an error if I put "might_sleep" inside
rcu_read_lock. I tried to figure out why but got lost.

BTW, I need the following to get current -git to compile.

NeilBrown

Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Tue Aug 19 11:59:37 2008 +1000

Fix compile error in security

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 2ee5ecf..0cc23a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ static inline int security_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child,

static inline int security_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *child)
{
- return cap_ptrace_traceme(parent);
+ return cap_ptrace_traceme(child);
}

static inline int security_capget(struct task_struct *target,



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-29 09:39    [W:0.077 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site