lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ftraced and suspend to ram
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > > > The code in question is the ftraced() function in
> > > > > kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, I'll have a look in a while.
> > >
> > > Can you try the appended patch, please?
> >
> > makes sense - i've applied it to tip/tracing/urgent, see the tidied up
> > commit below.
> >
> > It should be no big issue not being able to trace across suspend+resume
> > - and that restriction will go away with Steve's build-time based mcount
> > patching mechanism in v2.6.28.
>
> Patch looks okay to me, but I'm not sure if another issue is not
> hiding under it. Did anyone actually test ftrace + suspend after
> applying this?

I just tested this patch - it didn't help ;(

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 49f4c3f..02e41b2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/freezer.h>

#include <asm/ftrace.h>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-22 12:39    [W:0.083 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site