Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:13:22 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:46:15 -0700
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:08:13 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > + num_cpus_per_node = cpus_weight_nr(node_to_cpumask(node)); > > sparc64 allmodconfig: > > mm/quicklist.c: In function `max_pages': > mm/quicklist.c:44: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&' > > we seem to have a made a spectacular mess of cpumasks lately.
It should explode similarly on x86, since it also defines node_to_cpumask() as an inline function.
IA64 seems to be one of the few platforms to define this as a macro evaluating to the node-to-cpumask array entry, so it's clear what platform Motohiro-san did build testing on :-)
| |