Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: slower initcalls in -next | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:24:11 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 09:58 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At least, all alsa_* calls are only for ISA devices, and I don't think > it's worth to optimize. Changing such hardcoded delays could break > the running system easily. > > However, some of the above are definitely interesting to investigate > as they are mostly built-in and affect almost all people.
I didn't realize it till later , but the list is a little misleading .. Those times are a mix of execution, and blocking.. I think the top one (49 seconds!) was blocked most of the time, since ub_init() doesn't look very complex. I'm not sure if it what it was blocked on, or why ..
Daniel
| |