lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: slower initcalls in -next
From
Date
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 09:58 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> At least, all alsa_* calls are only for ISA devices, and I don't think
> it's worth to optimize. Changing such hardcoded delays could break
> the running system easily.
>
> However, some of the above are definitely interesting to investigate
> as they are mostly built-in and affect almost all people.

I didn't realize it till later , but the list is a little misleading ..
Those times are a mix of execution, and blocking.. I think the top one
(49 seconds!) was blocked most of the time, since ub_init() doesn't look
very complex. I'm not sure if it what it was blocked on, or why ..

Daniel



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-20 17:27    [W:0.037 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site