Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:57:24 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: bug in lmb_enforce_memory_limit() | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:46:22 +1000
> On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:25 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Sounds great. Mind if I push the following to Linus? > > Looks good to me. > > I'll test it on Monday. I don't know if I have a system with memory > holes to test on, but I take it you do? > > I notice some of our 32-bit code is using lmb_enforce_memory_limit() to > enforce an address limit, which is technically broken, but is probably > fine because it doesn't need to worry about holes.
Sounds like fun :-)
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Thanks for reviewing Michael.
| |