lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta.
From
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 04:20:39PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > We do need a standardized way of enabling it (since it does cost you
> > something in performance, so not everyone will want it on), and a
> > standardized way of reading i_version out to userspace. Maybe a mount
> > option is the right way to do it, maybe not.
> >
> > We may want to take this to the linux-fs list and try to get
> > agreements on these points; the main reason why it's not enabled by
> > default in ext4 is because the NFSv4 advanced caching code is in
> > common use (is it even in mainline)?
>
> I have not yet seen code actually using it at all, neither in mainline
> nor on one of the many nfs development lists.

Oops, I'd love to, and it should be very easy. How do I find out if
i_version is supported on a given superblock?

There's nothing particularly "advanced" about this, by the way--this is
a very minor variation on the caching model that nfs has always had, and
our nfsv4 server is currently pretty broken without it.

Actually, it's pretty broken even on nfsv2/v3 for filesystems with poor
time resolution.

--b.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-14 23:23    [W:0.128 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site