Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:49:55 -0700 | From | Max Krasnyansky <> | Subject | Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote: > >>> And I was hoping to do -rc3 today. Can I please have pull-requests for the >>> appropriate urgent scheduler/x86 fixes? Or should I just take these as >>> patches? >> It'd be nice if -rc3 included my cpuset patch so that we could put circular >> locking issues in the cpu hotplug path to the rest. >> Ingo, I'm talking about this: >> [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4) > > the latest (-v4) version of the patch was submitted just half an hour > ago and it's rather large/complex, with a few unrelated changes > (whitespace, etc.) mixed in as well. I'd like to wait for Paul's final > ack for -v4 (he has already agreed with the approach in general), and > wanted to have it tested myself as well, at least minimally.
Fair enough.
btw Whitespace and other cosmetic changes were requested by reviewers.
Max
| |