lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr


Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>>> And I was hoping to do -rc3 today. Can I please have pull-requests for the
>>> appropriate urgent scheduler/x86 fixes? Or should I just take these as
>>> patches?
>> It'd be nice if -rc3 included my cpuset patch so that we could put circular
>> locking issues in the cpu hotplug path to the rest.
>> Ingo, I'm talking about this:
>> [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
>
> the latest (-v4) version of the patch was submitted just half an hour
> ago and it's rather large/complex, with a few unrelated changes
> (whitespace, etc.) mixed in as well. I'd like to wait for Paul's final
> ack for -v4 (he has already agreed with the approach in general), and
> wanted to have it tested myself as well, at least minimally.

Fair enough.

btw Whitespace and other cosmetic changes were requested by reviewers.

Max


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-12 00:53    [W:1.915 / U:25.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site