Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:03:05 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce copy_user_handle_tail routine |
| |
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote: > > > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > > > Now, the stuff that comes *before* that point is the "try to fix up one > > > byte at a time" thing, which I'd like to be simple and dumb. At least to > > > start with. > > > > Just to be clear: do these patches are good enough now (to start > > with)? Or, may be, it needs to be further improved? > > I think they are getting there. I'm obviously not merging them in > 2.6.26, but I'd be happy to do so for .27. > > Obviously, I'd be even happier if it also went through the normal x86 > review cycles (ie Ingo &co), but the current series is largely ack'ed > by me.
applied them to tip/x86/core, for v2.6.27 merging, thanks everyone.
I've added Linus's Acked-by. Vitaly, could you please send your Signed-off-by line, it was missing from the patches. You can check the current form of the commits via:
git-pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86/core
(the patches changed slightly, there was some merge fallout due to other changes in this area.)
Ingo
| |