lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce copy_user_handle_tail routine

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
>
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> >
> > > Now, the stuff that comes *before* that point is the "try to fix up one
> > > byte at a time" thing, which I'd like to be simple and dumb. At least to
> > > start with.
> >
> > Just to be clear: do these patches are good enough now (to start
> > with)? Or, may be, it needs to be further improved?
>
> I think they are getting there. I'm obviously not merging them in
> 2.6.26, but I'd be happy to do so for .27.
>
> Obviously, I'd be even happier if it also went through the normal x86
> review cycles (ie Ingo &co), but the current series is largely ack'ed
> by me.

applied them to tip/x86/core, for v2.6.27 merging, thanks everyone.

I've added Linus's Acked-by. Vitaly, could you please send your
Signed-off-by line, it was missing from the patches. You can check the
current form of the commits via:

git-pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86/core

(the patches changed slightly, there was some merge fallout due to other
changes in this area.)

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-09 15:05    [W:0.089 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site