lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
    on 2008-8-1 8:39 Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
    [snip]
    >> The regression I reported exists on:
    >> 1) 8-core+HT(totally 16 logical processor) tulsa: 40% regression with volano, 8% with oltp;
    >> 2) 8-core+HT Montvale Itanium: 9% regression with volano; 8% with oltp;
    >> 3) 16-core tigerton: %70 with volano, %18 with oltp;
    >> 4) 8-core stoakley: %15 with oltp, testing failed with volanoMark.
    >>
    >> So the issues are popular on different architectures.
    > I know kernel needs the features and it might not be a good idea to reject them over and over again.
    > I will collect more data on tigerton and try to optimize it.

    Could you tell me the exact config options? the same with last time?

    as follows:

    # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
    CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y
    CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
    # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set
    CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y
    # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set


    > -yanmin
    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >
    >
    >




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-01 04:41    [W:4.563 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site