Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:35:11 +0800 | From | Miao Xie <> | Subject | Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 |
| |
on 2008-8-1 8:39 Zhang, Yanmin wrote: [snip] >> The regression I reported exists on: >> 1) 8-core+HT(totally 16 logical processor) tulsa: 40% regression with volano, 8% with oltp; >> 2) 8-core+HT Montvale Itanium: 9% regression with volano; 8% with oltp; >> 3) 16-core tigerton: %70 with volano, %18 with oltp; >> 4) 8-core stoakley: %15 with oltp, testing failed with volanoMark. >> >> So the issues are popular on different architectures. > I know kernel needs the features and it might not be a good idea to reject them over and over again. > I will collect more data on tigerton and try to optimize it.
Could you tell me the exact config options? the same with last time?
as follows:
# CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
> -yanmin > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > >
| |