Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:59:34 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix the bug of using AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT when set fail, no error output. |
| |
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:04:38 +0100 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote: > > > When the "status_get->mask" is "AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT". > > > If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit" succeeds, the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the failure of rate set. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows > > everything else > > Sanitized, applied, pushed to audit-current (audit.b53)
That tree doesn't appear to be in the linux-next lineup. Fixable, please?
| |