Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:08:50 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"? |
| |
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > legitimately experimental content in the source tree. surely > > *some* of that is suitably mature such that that dependency can be > > dropped. > > What is the connection between age of code and experimental status ?
perhaps nothing, perhaps lots. *of course* there can be features that are both long-lived and still experimental. just as, of course, there is stuff that was (properly) tagged as EXPERIMENTAL ages ago that has long since stabilized and can afford to stop being experimental.
just a small nagging for folks to take a quick look at what no longer needs to be tagged that way, that's all.
rday --
======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry: Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA ========================================================================
| |