| Subject | Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:10:09 +0200 |
| |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > So if the version were to be date-based, instead of releasing 2.6.26, > maybe we could have 2008.7 instead. Or just increment the major version > every decade, the middle version every year, and the minor version every > time we make a release. Whatever.
Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.
-Andi
|