Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Missing patch from stable [3/7] | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Date | Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:50:22 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:29 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Well, you know the implications of leaving these known bugs open more than > me. If you think some of them are really not needed, I'm fine with this, > but some definitely fix real bugs (judging by the code and the comments).
Yeah. Perhaps there should also be a rule, that -stable patches for EXPERIMENTAL stuff (like ecryptfs) are automatically rejected. And then they wouldn't increase the workload for the people collecting/reviewing the stable series.
Thanks, Miklos
| |