[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH] add a printk_init variant storing format strings in __initdata
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 09:59 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 01:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > We're going to want to be able to call printk_init() from modules.
> > Please fix and test that, if we decide to proceed.
> Can we fix that by making it an alias for printk in the module case?
> The only reason we need it to be __init is so that we get the section
> warnings when you use it from non-init code, right? Won't we get the
> warning when non-init code refers to the string in initdata anyway?

In fact, wasn't the warning Andy showed such a warning?

> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function something() to the variable
> The function something() references
> the variable __initdata __printk_init_fmt.31426.
> This is often because something lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of __printk_init_fmt.31426 is wrong.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-04 11:15    [W:0.037 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site