Messages in this thread | | | From | kamezawa.hiroyu@jp ... | Date | Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:06:13 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: change shmem handler. |
| |
----- Original Message ----- Sorry..a bit more words. >>Is that a good thing? If we really decide that globally we >>need such a counter, then fine for memcg to follow; but I've >>not yet heard it asked for. >After swap-controller is introduced, I can imagine there will be a >swap-full/swap-less cgroup. And shmem will be able to be swapped out. not >memcg handles limit of memory usage and Admin/Middleware will want to >know current limit is good or bad. So, showing amount of tmpfs >will be good (It's now shown as Cache...a pages easily kicked out ;) > I'm not sure but how this seems under memcg in which DataBase runs.
Now. - anon - cache (including DataBase's shmem) After - anon - cache (file cache) - shmem (DataBase's working area)
not good ?
Thanks, -Kame
| |