lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: change shmem handler.
----- Original Message -----
Sorry..a bit more words.
>>Is that a good thing? If we really decide that globally we
>>need such a counter, then fine for memcg to follow; but I've
>>not yet heard it asked for.
>After swap-controller is introduced, I can imagine there will be a
>swap-full/swap-less cgroup. And shmem will be able to be swapped out.
not
>memcg handles limit of memory usage and Admin/Middleware will want to
>know current limit is good or bad. So, showing amount of tmpfs
>will be good (It's now shown as Cache...a pages easily kicked out ;)
>
I'm not sure but how this seems under memcg in which DataBase runs.

Now.
- anon
- cache (including DataBase's shmem)
After
- anon
- cache (file cache)
- shmem (DataBase's working area)

not good ?

Thanks,
-Kame


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-01 03:09    [W:0.358 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site