lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/5] Memory controller soft limit introduction (v3)
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:30:50 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > Hmm, that is the case where "share" works well. Why soft-limit ?
> > i/o conroller doesn't support share ? (I don' know sorry.)
> >
>
> Share is a proportional allocation of a resource. Typically that resource is
> soft-limits, but not necessarily. If we re-use resource counters, my expectation
> is that
>
> A share implementation would under-neath use soft-limits.
>
Hmm...I don't convice at this point. (because it's future problem)
At least, please find lock-less approach to check soft-limit.

Thanks,
-Kame



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-30 06:17    [W:3.198 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site