Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:19:20 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/5] Memory controller soft limit introduction (v3) |
| |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:30:50 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Hmm, that is the case where "share" works well. Why soft-limit ? > > i/o conroller doesn't support share ? (I don' know sorry.) > > > > Share is a proportional allocation of a resource. Typically that resource is > soft-limits, but not necessarily. If we re-use resource counters, my expectation > is that > > A share implementation would under-neath use soft-limits. > Hmm...I don't convice at this point. (because it's future problem) At least, please find lock-less approach to check soft-limit.
Thanks, -Kame
| |