Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:16:56 +0800 | From | Li Zefan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:00:34 +0800 Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> on 2008-6-4 8:55 Li Zefan wrote: >>> Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800 >>>> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be >>>>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE >>>>> offline/online. >>>> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with >>>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch >>>> >>>> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense. ie: that >>>> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix. >>>> >>> They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in >>> the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring. >>> >> Right. I will modify my patches. > > I already did that, didn't I? >
Oh, I just had a look at that, and yes you did that, but in a wrong way. :(
You reverted the effects of this bugfix: cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch
| |