Messages in this thread | | | From | Johannes Weiner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/20] mm: generic show_mem() | Date | Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:25:57 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> This implements a platform-independent version of show_mem(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> > > Looking at this again, does having this as a Kconfig option really make > sense? We have no tristate in-tree users of this that I can see, wouldn't > this be better off in lib/? It would be preferable not to let the > HAVE_foo stuff get out of hand if we can avoid it.
I hate the current Kconfig usage, too. But I figured, if I won't obey on such decisions by people who maintain it, it won't have a chance to get in.
So, what do you suggest? Moving it to lib/ and have one simple #define if the arch wants to use it or not?
Hannes
| |